4.6 Article

High-entropy (Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Y0.2Yb0.2)4Al2O9with good high temperature stability, low thermal conductivity, and anisotropic thermal expansivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CERAMICS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 595-605

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40145-020-0399-0

Keywords

(Nd0; 2Sm0; 2Eu0; 2Y0; 2Y0; 2); high-entropy ceramics (HECs); environmental barrier coatings; phase stability; thermal properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The critical requirements for the environmental barrier coating (EBC) materials of silicon-based ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) include good tolerance to harsh environments, thermal expansion matches with the interlayer mullite, good high-temperature phase stability, and low thermal conductivity. Cuspidine-structured rare-earth aluminates RE(4)Al(2)O(9)have been considered as candidates of EBCs for their superior mechanical and thermal properties, but the phase transition at high temperatures is a notable drawback of these materials. To suppress the phase transition and improve the phase stability, a novel cuspidine-structured rare-earth aluminate solid solution (Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Y0.2Yb0.2)(4)Al(2)O(9)was designed and successfully synthesized inspired by entropy stabilization effect of high-entropy ceramics (HECs). The as-synthesized HE (Nd0.2Sm0.2Eu0.2Y0.2Yb0.2)(4)Al(2)O(9)exhibits a close thermal expansion coefficient (6.96x10(-6)K(-1)at 300-1473 K) to that of mullite, good phase stability from 300 to 1473 K, and low thermal conductivity (1.50 W center dot(m-1)center dot K(-1)at room temperature). In addition, strong anisotropic thermal expansion has been observed compared to Y(4)Al(2)O(9)and Yb4Al2O9. The mechanism for low thermal conductivity is attributed to the lattice distortion and mass difference of the constituent atoms, and the anisotropic thermal expansion is due to the anisotropic chemical bonding enhanced by the large size rare-earth cations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available