4.0 Article

Active and Protected: Developing a Safer Sex Handout for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 351-354

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0139

Keywords

sexual activity; sexual behavior; safe sex; information dissemination

Categories

Funding

  1. CCTST at the University ofCincinnati
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program [2UL1TR001425-05A1]
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [K07CA200668]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a critical need to engage adolescents and young adults with cancer in conversations regarding safer sexual activity during treatment. This study describes how one pediatric institution assessed and addressed provider barriers to these discussions, and developed an educational handout detailing recommendations for safer sex practices for AYAs with cancer. The adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the handout are discussed, along with barriers that other institutions may face when developing similar interventions.
There is a critical need to engage adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer in conversations regarding safer sexual activity during treatment. Many providers, however, report lacking the knowledge and/or tools to engage in these discussions. This article describes the experience of one pediatric institution in assessing and addressing provider barriers to safer sexual activity discussions among AYAs with cancer. Feedback from patients and providers resulted in an educational handout detailing recommendations regarding safer sex practices for AYAs with cancer. Handout adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility are described alongside barriers to assist other institutions seeking to develop similar interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available