Journal
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101148
Keywords
Wetlands; Environmental law; Mangroves; Law; Ecosystem services
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The ecosystem services concept can deliver improved conservation outcomes, yet it is not uniformly translated into environmental law and policy. Here we examine Australian laws and policies in the context of mangroves and coastal wetlands to assess and analyse the extent to which the ecosystem services concept has been integrated. A number of key themes emerged from our research, including: potential difficulties in finding relevant laws because of (1) inconsistent definitions; (2) the large amount of law and policy, and inadequate integration of ecosystem services because (3) not all ecosystem services provided by mangroves and wetlands are recognised in law and policy; and (4) different ecosystem services are addressed under different legal instruments. We also found that (5) ecosystem services are referenced more often in policy than in law; and (6) this is often in the form of a 'mention' rather that regulation. Finally, we also found (7) insufficient spatial protection of mangroves and wetlands; (8) significant degrees of administrative discretion; and (9) a lack of harmonisation across jurisdictions. We anticipate that these findings will be of assistance to law and policymakers and resource managers, as a tool for identifying deficiencies in legal frameworks as a precursor to reform.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available