4.6 Article

Influence of Non-Reactive Epoxy Binder on the Permeability and Friction Coefficient of Twill-Woven Carbon Fabric in the Liquid Composite Molding Process

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10207039

Keywords

composites; processing; permeability; fibers; injection molding

Funding

  1. Development of a Skin Spar IntegratedWingtip Composite Structure for a Single Aisle Aircraft using High Temperature Resin Infusion Process [20005403]
  2. Development of Mass Production Technology for Trunk Lid based on Hybrid Wet Compression Molding [10083584]
  3. Civil-Military Technology Cooperation Program [15-CA-MA-13-MKE]
  4. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10053841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the liquid composite molding process, a binder is used to fix the preform. In this study, the influence of a non-reactive epoxy binder was investigated. To allow the measurement of permeability, the preform specimen was produced under three preforming conditions: neat fabric preform, binder-treated fabric preform without heat treatment, and binder-treated fabric preform with heat treatment. The in-plane directional permeability, K1 (having maximum flow velocity), and K2 (having minimum flow velocity) of the binder-treated fabric preform decreased approximately 80% compared to the neat fabric preform. The permeability in the out-of-plane direction decreased approximately 80% in the binder-treated fabric preform without heat treatment and about 98% in the binder-treated fabric preform with heat treatment. This decrease occurred because the treated binder on the fiber hindered resin impregnation. The effect of the binder on the friction coefficient of carbon fabric was also investigated. The friction coefficient was high when the binder was on the friction surface and increased 40-200% at 110 degrees C, compared to 25 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available