4.5 Article

Discovery of Prenyltransferase Inhibitors with In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activity

Journal

ACS INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2979-2993

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00472

Keywords

cis-prenyltransferases; growth inhibition; DPPS inhibitor; IC50; S. aureus; antibiotics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21807031]
  2. Open Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering [SKLBEE2019003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities from Hunan University (China)
  4. United States Public Health Service (National Institutes of Health) [GM065307, CA158191]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cis-prenyltransferases such as undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase (UPPS) and decaprenyl diphosphate synthase (DPPS) are essential enzymes in bacteria and are involved in cell wall biosynthesis. UPPS and DPPS are absent in the human genome, so they are of interest as targets for antibiotic development. Here, we screened a library of 750 compounds from National Cancer Institute Diversity Set V for the inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DPPS and found 17 hits, and then IC(50)s were determined using dose-response curves. Compounds were tested for growth inhibition against a panel of bacteria, for in vivo activity in a Staphylococcus aureus/Caenorhabditis elegans model, and for mammalian cell toxicity. The most active DPPS inhibitor was the dicarboxylic acid redoxal (compound 10), which also inhibited undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase (UPPS) as well as farnesyl diphosphate synthase. 10 was active against S. aureus, Clostridiodes difficile, Bacillus anthracis Sterne, and Bacillus subtilis, and there was a 3.4-fold increase in IC50 on addition of a rescue agent, undecaprenyl monophosphate. We found that 10 was also a weak protonophore uncoupler, leading to the idea that it targets both isoprenoid biosynthesis and the proton motive force. In an S. aureus/C. elegans in vivo model, 10 reduced the S. aureus burden 3 times more effectively than did ampicillin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available