4.1 Article

Effects of weir geometry on scour development in the downstream of Piano Key Weirs

Journal

WATER SUPPLY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 289-298

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2020.272

Keywords

Piano Key Weir; scour; trapezoidal model; weir geometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on downstream scouring of Piano Key Weirs (PKWs) is limited and weir geometry and height impact scouring in the downstream. Scour hole parameters increase with discharge rate and weir height in both rectangular and trapezoidal models. Under similar discharge conditions, rectangular models have greater scour depth downstream compared to trapezoidal models.
Scouring in the downstream of all weirs, including Piano Key Weirs (PKWs), can have major safety implications. Since the research on downstream scouring of PKWs is very limited, and the weir geometry is also known to have an impact on downstream scouring, this study investigated scouring in the downstream of PKWs with rectangular and trapezoidal geometries and two different heights. The scour hole measurements showed that in both rectangular and trapezoidal models, scour hole parameters increased both with the increase in discharge rate and the increase in weir height. Under similar discharge conditions, the scour depth downstream from the rectangular model was greater than that downstream from the trapezoidal model. The dimensionless maximum scour depth, the distance of maximum scour depth from the weir toe, and the scour hole length for the trapezoidal PKW were, on average, 6, 13, and 11% lower than the corresponding ones for the rectangular PKW, respectively. However, these differences decreased with the increase in falling height. For both weir geometries, the maximum scour depth was aligned with the outlet keys. In addition, the maximum scour depth under the outlet keys was 13% greater than the one under the inlet keys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available