4.4 Article

Phosphorus Diffusion and Agronomic Efficiency of Chicken Litter Organomineral Fertilizers Improved with Binder Materials

Journal

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 3765-3772

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01274-0

Keywords

Agriculture; Additive material; Chicken litter; Hardness; Agronomic efficiency; Manure waste

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The addition of materials to organomineral fertilizers can improve the mechanical strength of granules without affecting the dynamics of nutrient release and agronomic efficiency.
The use of chicken litter (CL) as a source of nutrients for agriculture is a sustainable alternative to disposal the organic waste generated in poultry production and some granulated organomineral fertilizers (OMFs) have been produced for this purpose. However, the low resistance to breakage of granules of such fertilizers is still limiting large-scale use and storage. Previous work has demonstrated that the use of binder materials is able to provide an increase in resistance to the breaking of granules of OMFs, however, their influence on the dynamics of nutrient release in the soil and agronomic efficiency have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the use of additive materials on the release of nutrients into the soil and the agronomic efficiency of organomineral fertilizers. In order to do this, OMFs produced with 3% of different bentonites, kaolinite and magnesium oxide were used. Experiments of phosphorus diffusion in the soil and evaluation of agronomic efficiency in pots demonstrate that the addition of these materials to FOMs does not influence the dynamics of P release and agronomic efficiency, when compared to the control without additives. OMFs containing additive materials to improve their mechanical strength without loss of nutrient release and agronomic efficiency are the main result of this work. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available