4.6 Article

Entomopathogenic fungi decrease Rhizoctonia disease in potato in field conditions

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9895

Keywords

Rhizoctonia solani; Metarhizium robertsii; Beauveria bassiana; Endophyte; Antagonism; Peroxidase; Biocontrol; Siberia; Yield

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00138]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-14-00138] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhizoctonia potato disease is widespread in the world and causes substantial yield and quality losses in potato. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium robertsii and Beauveria bassiana in the inhibition of potato Rhizoctonia complex disease. The efficacy of the entomopathogenic fungi M. robertsii and B. bassiana in the defense of potato against Rhizoctonia disease (stem cancer, black scrulf and other forms of manifestation on tubers) was estimated under field conditions in Western Siberia. Preplanting treatment of the tubers with B. bassiana decreased Rhizoctonia disease in the stems and stolons. At the same time, treatment with M. robertsii did not cause a decrease in Rhizoctonia disease in these organs. However, both fungi decreased the sclerotium index on the tubers of new crops. We demonstrated two mechanisms of inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani by M. robertsii and B. bassiana, including (1) direct effect, expressed as inhibition of R. solani sclerotium formation in cocultivation assays, and (2) indirect effect, which is associated with increased peroxidase activity in potato roots under the influence of colonization by entomopathogenic fungi. We suggest that the treatment of seed tubers with B. basiana can effectively manage Rhizoctonia disease during the plant vegetative season and that both fungi significantly improve the quality of the new tuber crop.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available