4.2 Article

Comparisons of Net Heat Flux Data Sets Over the Western North Pacific

Journal

OCEAN SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 477-493

Publisher

KOREA INST OCEAN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KIOST
DOI: 10.1007/s12601-020-0036-4

Keywords

ensemble spread; interannual variability; intercomparison; net heat flux; western North Pacific

Funding

  1. project titled Investigation and prediction system development of marine heatwave around the Korean Peninsula originated from the subarctic and western Pacific - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea [20190344]
  2. project titled Chungcheong Sea Grant Program - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea
  3. Korea Institute of Ocean Science Technology [PE99811]
  4. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [PE99811] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the intercomparisons of 22 net heat flux (NHF) data sets in terms of mean, linear trend, and interannual variability during 1993-2007 over the western North Pacific and its surrounding waters. The data sets can be categorized into the dominant group that shares common interannual variabilities and the outcasts that exhibit exceptional variability. Based on our analysis, we provide guidelines for users to choose reliable NHF data sets in the study regions. In addition, many NHF data sets tend to represent similar interannual variabilities in the marginal sea regions, whereas the opposite is true in open oceans where interannual variability is weak. Also, we find an evidence showing the mean biases of the NHF are mainly due to the difference in calculation of the latent heat flux. The aforementioned information will be useful for a wide community of scientists who are interested in using heat flux data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available