4.3 Article

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in rural and urban districts in Telemark county, Norway

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102352

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Epidemiology; Prevalence; Incidence; Rural; Norway

Funding

  1. Telemark Hospital Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore the trends in prevalence and incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Telemark, Norway (latitude 58.7-60.3N), over the past two decades, with focus on differences between rural and urban areas. Methods: Data from all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MS in Telemark since 1993 were prospectively recorded and collected in a retrospective chart review. Prevalence estimates on January 1 51 1999, 2009 and 2019, and incidence rates at five-year intervals between 1999 and 2018 were calculated and all results were adjusted to the European Standard Population. The study population was divided into urban and rural residency using a Norwegian governmental index. Results: We registered 579 patients with MS in Telemark between 1999 and 2019. The adjusted prevalence estimates for Januaryls 1st 1999, 2009 and 2019 were 105.8/10(5), 177.1/10 (5) and 260.6/10(5), respectively. In 2019, the prevalence estimates were 250.4/10(5) in urban and 316.2 /10(5) in rural areas. Between 1999 and 2018, the yearly incidence increased from 8.4/10 5 to 14.4/10(5). Conclusions: The prevalence of MS in Telemark is among the highest ever reported in Norway, consistent with an increasing incidence in the county over the past twenty years. The even higher prevalence in the rural areas is unlikely to be explained by possible risk factors like latitude, exposure to sunlight and diet. Further studies on differences between urban and rural areas are required to reveal possible new risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available