4.5 Article

Achievements of Nearly Zero Earing Defects on SPCC Cylindrical Drawn Cup Using Multi Draw Radius Die

Journal

METALS
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met10091204

Keywords

cylindrical cup; deep drawing; draw radius; earing; microstructure

Funding

  1. Petchra Pra Jom Klao Master's Degree Research Scholarship from King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
  2. King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, the old-fashioned cylindrical cup shapes are still widely used, and there are many defects which could not be solved yet. In the present research, the classical earing defects, which are mainly caused by the material mechanical property of the anisotropic property of the material (R-value), are focused on. The multi draw radius (MDR) deep drawing die is applied and investigated to achieve nearly zero earing defects by encountering theR-value during the deep drawing process. Based on the experiments, in different directions in the sheet plane, the somewhat concurrent plastic deformation could be controlled, and the uniform elongated grain microstructure and uniform strain distributions on the cup wall could be achieved. Therefore, on the basis of these characteristics, the earing defects could be prevented, and the nearly zero earing defects could be achieved. However, to achieve the nearly zero earing defects, the suitable MDR die design relating to theR-value should be strictly considered. In the present research, to apply the MDR die for the medium carbon steel sheet grade SPCC cylindrical drawn cup, the following was recommended: the large draw radius positioned at 45 degrees to the rolling direction and the small draw radius positioned along the plane and at 90 degrees to the rolling direction. Therefore, in the present research, it was originally revealed that the nearly zero earing defects could be successfully performed on the process by using the MDR die application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available