4.3 Article

Total cavopulmonary connection with a new restorative vascular graft: results at 2 years

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 4168-4173

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-19-739

Keywords

Extracardiac conduit; congenital heart disease; endogenous tissue restoration; bioabsorbable polymer; Fontan procedure; restorative vascular graft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To present a 2-year follow-up regarding safety and hemodynamic performance of a new restorative vascular graft used as extracardiac cavo-pulmonary connection in patients with univentricular congenital heart malformations. Methods: The graft was implanted in five patients (aged 4-12 years) as extracardiac connection between the inferior vena cava and the pulmonary artery. The conduit consists of a bioabsorbable polymer-based implant able to generate endogenous tissue restoration leading to a fully functional neo-vessel while the polymer progressively absorbs. All patients have reached more than 24 months following surgery and underwent echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Results: All patients are doing well at 24 months follow-up, with no graft-related serious adverse events. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated adequate function of the conduit in all patients while magnetic resonance imaging showed anatomical and functional stability of the restorative grafts. Conclusions: The new restorative conduit has been successfully used for the second step of the Fontan procedure as extracardiac total cavopulmonary connection. The results are promising because they suggest that complete transformation of a bioabsorbable polymer and replacement through endogenous tissue may represent a major advantage in the treatment of congenital heart disease patients. Further monitoring will allow to evaluate the long-term behavior of this new graft, in terms of clinical and hemodynamic performance, thrombogenicity and ability to grow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available