4.6 Article

Splicing Characteristics of Dystrophin Pseudoexons and Identification of a Novel Pathogenic Intronic Variant in the DMD Gene

Journal

GENES
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes11101180

Keywords

pseudoexon; canonical exon; splicing characteristics; DMD; intronic variants

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFC1300605]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z191100006619034]
  3. China International Medical Exchange Foundation (Chinese Neurology Special Fund) [CIMF-Z-2016-2-1801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudoexon (PE) inclusion has been implicated in various dystrophinopathies; however, its splicing characteristics have not been fully investigated. This study aims to analyze the splicing characteristics of dystrophin PEs and compare them with those of dystrophin canonical exons (CEs). Forty-two reported dystrophin PEs were divided into a splice site (ss) group and a splicing regulatory element (SRE) group. Five dystrophin PEs with characteristics of poison exons were identified and categorized as the possible poison exon group. The comparative analysis of each essential splicing signal among different groups of dystrophin PEs and dystrophin CEs revealed that the possible poison exon group had a stronger 3 ' ss compared to any other group. As for auxiliary SREs, different groups of dystrophin PEs were found to have a smaller density of diverse types of exonic splicing enhancers and a higher density of several types of exonic splicing silencers compared to dystrophin CEs. In addition, the possible poison exon group had a smaller density of 3 ' ss intronic splicing silencers compared to dystrophin CEs. To our knowledge, our findings indicate for the first time that poison exons might exist in DMD (the dystrophin gene) and present with different splicing characteristics than other dystrophin PEs and CEs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available