4.2 Review

A systematic review of primary active surveillance management of low-risk papillary carcinoma

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 11-17

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000244

Keywords

active surveillance; papillary thyroid cancer; thyroid carcinoma; thyroidectomy

Categories

Funding

  1. Chair in Health Services Research from Cancer Care Ontario
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care
  3. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Clinician Scientist Merit Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Active surveillance is close follow-up of neoplasms, with predetermined intervention triggers. We systematically reviewed the published English language literature on primary active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Recent findings We searched seven electronic databases (1980-2015), supplemented with a hand search. Two reviewers independently screened 1715 citations and reviewed 32 full-text papers, ultimately including two papers. Data were independently abstracted. There were two Japanese single-center, single-arm studies reporting on 1235 and 322 patients with PTC microcarcinoma (primary <1 cm in diameter) confined to the thyroid. Mean study follow-up was of 5.0 and 6.5 years, respectively. Disease triggers for thyroidectomy included progression of the primary tumor or incident metastatic disease. The rates of thyroidectomy were 15.5% (191/1235) and 8.7% (28/322) in respective studies. The incidence of primary tumor enlargement >= 3 mm in maximal diameter was 4.6% (58/1235) and 5.0% (16/322). The incidence of nodal metastases was 1.5% (19/1235) and 0.9% (3/322). There were neither reports of PTC-related death nor development of distant metastatic disease. Quality of life, psychosocial health, and economic outcomes were not reported. Summary In two Japanese single-arm studies, active surveillance of PTC microcarcinoma was relatively well tolerated; however, more long-term outcome research is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available