4.1 Review

What's new in the functional anatomy of pelvic organ prolapse?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 420-429

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000312

Keywords

endopelvic fascia; levator ani muscles; pathophysiology; pelvic floor anatomy; pelvic organ prolapse

Funding

  1. Office for Research on Women's Health
  2. National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development [P50 HD044406, HD038665]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewProvide an evidence-based review of pelvic floor functional anatomy related to pelvic organ prolapse.Recent findingsPelvic organ support depends on interactions between the levator ani muscle and pelvic connective tissues. Muscle failure exposes the vaginal wall to a pressure differential producing abnormal tension on the attachments of the pelvic organs to the pelvic sidewall. Birth-induced injury to the pubococcygeal portion of the levator ani muscle is seen in 55% of women with prolapse and 16% of women with normal support. Failure of the lateral connective tissue attachments between the uterus and vagina to the pelvic wall (cardinal, uterosacral, and paravaginal) are strongly related with prolapse (effect sizes approximate to 2.5) and are also highly correlated with one another (r approximate to 0.85). Small differences exist with prolapse in factors involving the vaginal wall length and width (effect sizes approximate to 1). The primary difference in ligament properties between women with and without prolapse is found in ligament length. Only minor differences in ligament stiffness are seen.SummaryPelvic organ prolapse occurs because of injury to the levator ani muscles and failure of the lateral connections between the pelvic organs to the pelvic sidewall. Abnormalities of the vaginal wall fascial tissues may play a minor role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available