4.3 Article

Cardiac hypertrophy in a dish: a human stem cell based mode

Journal

BIOLOGY OPEN
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.052381

Keywords

Cardiac hypertrophy; Cardiomyocytes; Disease model; Endothelin-1; Stem cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Systems Biology Research Centre at University of Skovde under grants from the Knowledge Foundation [2014/0301, 2016/0294, 2016/0330]
  2. Takara Bio Europe, Gothenburg, Sweden
  3. AstraZeneca RD, Gothenburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac hypertrophy is an important and independent risk factor for the development of heart failure. To better understand the mechanisms and regulatory pathways involved in cardiac hypertrophy, there is a need for improved in vitro models. In this study, we investigated how hypertrophic stimulation affected human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes (CMs). The cells were stimulated with endothelin-1 (ET-1) for 8, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h. Parameters including cell size, ANP-, proBNP-, and lactate concentration were analyzed. Moreover, transcriptional profiling using RNA-sequencing was performed to identify differentially expressed genes following ET-1 stimulation. The results show that the CMs increase in size by approximately 13% when exposed to ET-1 in parallel to increases in ANP and proBNP protein and mRNA levels. Furthermore, the lactate concentration in the media was increased indicating that the CMs consume more glucose, a hallmark of cardiac hypertrophy. Using RNA-seq, a hypertrophic gene expression pattern was also observed in the stimulated CMs. Taken together, these results show that hiPSC-derived CMs stimulated with ET-1 display a hypertrophic response. The results from this study also provide new molecular insights about the underlying mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy and may help accelerate the development of new drugs against this condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available