4.6 Article

Ionization-Induced Subcycle Metallization of Nanoparticles in Few-Cycle Pulses

Journal

ACS PHOTONICS
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 3207-3215

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01282

Keywords

strong-field nanophysics; avalanche ionization

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SPP1840, SFB652]
  4. DFG [398382624, ZH582/1-1, TI210-7/1, TI210-8/1]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-05409, 2019-02376]
  6. Atomic, Molecular and Optical Sciences Program, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-01ER15213]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-86ER13491]
  8. BMBF [05K16KEA]
  9. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [05K16HRB]
  10. Swedish Research Council [2019-02376, 2016-05409] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  11. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-01ER15213] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strong-field laser-matter interactions in nanoscale targets offer unique avenues for the generation and detailed characterization of matter under extreme conditions. Field-driven, subcycle ionization-induced metallization of nanoscale solids in intense laser fields has been predicted (Peltz et al. Time-Resolved X-ray Imaging of Anisotropic Nanoplasma Expansion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 133401), but its observation was hampered by a lack of a smoking gun. Here, we report the ultrafast metallization of isolated dielectric and semiconducting nanoparticles under intense few-cycle laser pulses. The highest-energy electron emission is found to be a decisive proof that shows a characteristic cutoff modification to a metallic limit for intensities high enough to ignite carrier avalanching in the volume of the particles. Semiclassical Mean-field Mie Monte-Carlo transport simulations reveal the underlying dynamics and explain the observed evolution by near-field driven electron backscattering from the metallizing target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available