4.6 Article

Student Engagement for Sustainability of Chinese International Education: The Case of International Undergraduate Students in China

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su12176831

Keywords

international student education; China; student engagement; environmental influences

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Scheme [71804145]
  2. Social Science Fund of Shaanxi Province [2018Q03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Student engagement has been attracting attention in the discussion of higher education (HE) quality. Despite the rapid increase of international students in China, little understanding has been gained for quality management on these students' engagement in learning. This paper focuses on international undergraduate students in Chinese higher education institutions, exploring the nature and characteristics of their academic engagement and the environmental factors influencing the engagement. The discussion was based on a synthesis of the findings of two studies, i.e., an exploratory qualitative study following a small group of international students at a research university and a large-scale survey involving 1428 international students at 34 Chinese universities. The analyses revealed less than satisfactory levels of international students' engagement, with a high proportion of the participants being passively or ineffectively involved in learning. The qualitative findings highlighted pedagogical and attitudinal factors that affected international students' engagement. The survey results indicated six environmental factors, categorized into three groups, having significant effects on the respondents' engagement. Although located in China, the analyses bear implications for practitioners striving for the sustainable development of international education in a broader range of contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available