4.2 Review

Novel assessments of systemic calcification propensity

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 278-284

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000237

Keywords

calcification propensity; calciprotein particles; calciprotein particle-fetuin-A; fetuin-A; systemic calcification control; T-50-Test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewBlood is a biological fluid, which controls the precipitation of calcium and phosphate and transports mineral debris. This review presents and discusses the current concepts and novel assessment methods of systemic calcification propensity in blood.Recent findingsCalcium and phosphate combine with calcification-inhibiting proteins, mainly fetuin-A, to form amorphous calcium phosphate-containing primary calciprotein particles (CPPs). These nanosized mineral-protein clusters undergo spontaneous transformation to secondary CPP, which contain crystalline calcium phosphate. Two recently developed methods assess complementary aspects of the calcification propensity of serum. The CPP-fetuin-A method determines the amount of sedimentable fetuin-A, whereas the T-50-Test determines the transformation time point T-50 from amorphous to crystalline CPPs in artificially supersaturated serum.Clinical studies in renal patients have already demonstrated close associations of the CPP-fetuin-A method with all-cause mortality, severity of coronary calcification and aortic stiffness, and of the T-50-Test with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, renal graft failure and aortic stiffening.SummarySystemic calcification propensity can be assessed by two novel methods providing complementary information about the status and performance of the humoral calcification-regulating system in serum. These tests may help guide better patient care in the future with the use of more individualized therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available