4.4 Article

Association of Age at Myopia Onset With Risk of High Myopia in Adulthood in a 12-Year Follow-up of a Chinese Cohort

Journal

JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 11, Pages 1129-1134

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3451

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0116500]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600763, 81900899]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Question What is the risk of developing high myopia in adulthood in association with a specific age at myopia onset? Findings In this cohort study of 443 individuals with myopia, the risk of developing high myopia was greater than 50% for those with myopia onset at 7 or 8 years of age. The risk substantially decreased to approximately 30% for onset at 9 years of age, 20% for onset at 10 years of age, and less than 5% for onset at 12 years or older. Meaning These data suggest that early onset is strongly associated with high myopia risk in adulthood and that a delay in each year of onset substantially reduces this risk, supporting the need for prompt myopia prevention strategies. Importance Early-onset myopia is well known to progress to high myopia in adulthood. However, no accurate estimation of how a specific age at myopia onset is associated with the probability of developing high myopia in adulthood is available, and a very-long-term follow-up study with data from annual visits is needed. Objective To estimate the risk of developing high myopia in adulthood associated with a specific age at myopia onset from a data set with a 12-year annual follow-up. Design, Setting, and Participants This ongoing, population-based prospective cohort study of twins was conducted in Guangzhou, China, on July 11, 2006. Data from baseline to August 31, 2018, were analyzed. The first-born twins completed follow-up until 17 years or older, and the 443 participants (after exclusions) who developed myopia were included in the analysis. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2018, to January 20, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Age at myopia onset was determined by prospective annual cycloplegic refractions (365 participants [82.4%]) or with a questionnaire. Refraction in adulthood was defined as the cycloplegic refraction measured at the last follow-up visit. Results Among the 443 eligible participants (247 [55.8%] female; mean [SD] age at myopia onset, 11.7 [2.0] years), 54 (12.2%) developed high myopia (spherical equivalent, -6.00 diopters or worse determined by cycloplegic refractions) in adulthood. Among participants with age at myopia onset of 7 or 8 years, 14 of 26 (53.9%; 95% CI, 33.4%-73.4%) developed high myopia in adulthood; among those with onset at 9 years of age, 12 of 37 (32.4%; 95% CI, 18.0%-49.8%); among those with onset at 10 years of age, 14 of 72 (19.4%; 95% CI, 11.1%-30.5%); among those with onset at 11 years of age, 11 of 78 (14.1%; 95% CI, 7.3%-23.8%); and among those with onset at 12 years or older, 3 of 230 (1.3%; 95% CI, 0.2%-3.8%). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that the risk of developing high myopia in adulthood decreased significantly with delay in the age at myopia onset (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.55;P < .001), from greater than 50% for 7 or 8 years of age to approximately 30% for 9 years of age and 20% for 10 years of age. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that the risk of high myopia is relatively high in children with myopia onset during the early school ages. Each year of delay in the age at onset substantially reduces the chance of developing high myopia in adulthood, highlighting the importance of identifying effective prevention strategies under investigation, such as increasing outdoor time. This national cohort study estimates the risk of developing high myopia in adulthood in association with a specific age at myopia onset based on a data set of Chinese patients with 12-year annual follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available