4.8 Review

PCSK9 inhibition: the way forward in the treatment of dyslipidemia

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0503-4

Keywords

Cholesterol-lowering drugs; LDL-cholesterol; PCSK9

Funding

  1. Cerenis Therapeutics
  2. Medicines Company
  3. CSL Behring
  4. Amgen
  5. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Genzyme
  8. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals
  9. Esperion Therapeutics
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Omthera Pharmaceuticals
  12. ProNova
  13. Vascular Biogenics
  14. Boehringer Ingelheim
  15. Catabasis Pharmaceuticals
  16. AtheroNova
  17. uniQure
  18. Novartis
  19. Merck
  20. Pfizer
  21. Isis Pharmaceuticals
  22. Kowa
  23. Dezima Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barely a decade after the discovery of the gene encoding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and its recognition as a key player in cholesterol metabolism, PCSK9 inhibition is now considered an exciting approach in the reduction of residual risk of cardiovascular disease. The progress from PCSK9 discovery to the development of targeted treatment has been unprecedented in terms of scale and speed. The first suggestion of a link between PCSK9 and hypercholesterolemia was published in 2003; a decade later, two meta-analyses of clinical trials comparing anti-PCSK9 treatment to placebo or ezetimibe, including >10,000 hypercholesterolemic individuals, were published. Currently, three PCSK9 inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical outcome trials and the results will determine the future of these lipid-lowering therapies by establishing their clinical efficacy in terms of cardiovascular event reduction, safety, and the consequences of prolonged exposure to very low levels of LDL-cholesterol. Irrespective of their outcomes, the exceptionally rapid development of these drugs exemplifies how novel technologies, genetic validation, and rapid clinical progression provide the tools to expedite the development of new drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available