4.7 Article

Improved EMD-Based Complex Prediction Model for Wind Power Forecasting

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 2790-2802

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.2976038

Keywords

Predictive models; Wind forecasting; Forecasting; Wind speed; Optimization; Wind power generation; Data models; Wind forecasting; wind power; neural networks; optimization methods

Funding

  1. Business Finland Smart Energy Program, 2017-2021
  2. FEDER funds through COMPETE 2020
  3. Portuguese funds through FCT [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029803 (02/SAICT/2017)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a response to rapidly increasing penetration of wind power generation in modern electric power grids, accurate prediction models are crucial to deal with the associated uncertainties. Due to the highly volatile and chaotic nature of wind power, employing complex intelligent prediction tools is necessary. Accordingly, this article proposes a novel improved version of empirical mode decomposition (IEMD) to decompose wind measurements. The decomposed signal is provided as input to a hybrid forecasting model built on a bagging neural network (BaNN) combined with K-means clustering. Moreover, a new intelligent optimization method named ChB-SSO is applied to automatically tune the BaNN parameters. The performance of the proposed forecasting framework is tested using different seasonal subsets of real-world wind farm case studies (Alberta and Sotavento) through a comprehensive comparative analysis against other well-known prediction strategies. Furthermore, to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed framework, different forecast horizons have been considered in different test cases. Several error assessment criteria were used and the obtained results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method for wind forecasting compared to other methods for all test cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available