4.3 Review

New initiatives to develop self-testing for HIV

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 50-57

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000336

Keywords

acceptability; HIV self-test; sensitivity; window period

Funding

  1. Department of Health [RP-PG-1212-20006] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-PG-1212-20006] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  3. National Institute for Health Research [RP-PG-1212-20006] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to describe the most recent literature on outcomes and issues associated with HIV self-testing (HIVST). Recent findings HIVST is acceptable to a range of populations in a variety of contexts, particularly if users' values and preferences are taken into account in intervention development. Approaches being explored in ongoing and planned studies are the efficacy of HIVST to increase diagnosis of long-standing prevalent infections and to reduce the interval between HIV transmission and diagnosis, particularly in high-incidence groups. Though there is little evidence of harms related to HIVST, this remains a potential issue. Concerns remain about the reliability of currently available HIVST kits, which have lower sensitivity than testing options available in clinical settings, particularly in early HIV infection. Evidence on linkage to care for confirmatory testing after a reactive HIVST result and the cost-effectiveness of HIVST to increase rates of HIV diagnosis is currently limited. Summary HIVST is a relatively new innovation that is acceptable to key populations and which could increase HIV testing rates and rates of HIV diagnosis, especially in at-risk groups. Concerns remain about test sensitivity (particularly in early infection), and linkages to care for confirmatory testing after a reactive HIVST.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available