4.7 Article

Demand-Side Management With Shared Energy Storage System in Smart Grid

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 4466-4476

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2020.2980318

Keywords

Games; Nash equilibrium; Energy storage; Schedules; Peak to average power ratio; Computational modeling; Energy consumption; Game theory; shared energy storage system (ESS); capacity trading; generalized Nash equilibrium

Funding

  1. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [19PIYR-B153277-01]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [5199990113928] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy storage systems (ESSs) have been considered to be an effective solution to reduce the spatial and temporal imbalance between the stochastic energy generation and the demand. To effectively utilize an ESS, an approach of jointly sharing and operating an ESS has been proposed in a conceptual way. However, there is a lack of analytic approaches designed to optimize the operation of such a system considering interactions among users in a game theoretic perspective. In this study, we propose the energy capacity trading and operation (ECTO) game where each agent determines two actions, capacity trading, and the 24-hour ahead charging-discharging scheduling with the capacity that will be assigned, to minimize the energy operation cost. We then propose a distributed optimization strategy to find a generalized Nash equilibrium for the proposed ECTO game. Simulation studies show that when optimally operated, a shared ESS can decrease both the total energy operating cost and the peak-to-average ratio of the energy for the entire grid compared to the conventional ESS control strategy without ESS sharing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available