4.6 Article

Optimal Stealthy Deception Attack Against Cyber-Physical Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 50, Issue 9, Pages 3963-3972

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2912622

Keywords

Detectors; Gaussian distribution; Covariance matrices; Symmetric matrices; Upper bound; Technological innovation; Cyber-physical system (CPS) security; deception attack; Kullback-Leibler (K-L) divergence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873034, 61503026, 61836001]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4182057]
  3. Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61720106010]
  4. Graduate Technological Innovation Project of Beijing Institute of Technology [2018CX20025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the problem of designing the optimal deception attack to maximize a utility function with the Kullback-Leibler divergence adopted as a detection constraint. The utility function reflects the goal of pulling the state away from the origin, increasing the cost of the controller and decreasing the cost of the attacker. To analyze the stealthiness of the attack, the attack signal is decomposed into two parts, one of which is strict stealthy. The necessary and sufficient condition is derived for the case that the strict stealthy attack cannot lead to an unbounded benefit. In this case, the linear transformation of the optimal attack is proved to be a Gaussian distribution. With the mean value and covariance of the Gaussian distribution as variables, the original problem is transformed into a new problem which may not be convex. A suboptimal attack policy is provided and the upper bound for the loss of benefit when using the suboptimal attack is also given. A numerical example of unmanned ground vehicle is illustrated to verify the effectiveness of the proposed attack policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available