4.1 Review

Cell therapy in chronic liver disease

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 189-194

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000262

Keywords

bioartificial liver; cell therapy; chronic liver disease

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK106667, R01 DK056733, R41 DK092105] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewTo date, the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease is liver transplantation, which is limited by the shortage of available organs. Cell therapy, in the form of cell transplantation or cell-based extracorporeal support devices, may in the future offer an alternative to transplantation, or at least provide liver function support as a bridging therapy until surgery may be performed. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most recent advances made in the field of cell therapy and regenerative medicine for the treatment of chronic liver disease.Recent findingsAfter hepatocyte transplantation, long-term engraftment in the liver and spleen may be achieved, which can be stimulated through preconditioning, multiple infusions, and inflammatory response blockade. Mesenchymal stem cells are promising candidates for cell transplantation, as they have been shown to reduce liver fibrosis and support endogenous regeneration. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells are also being tested in this setting, because of their ready availability. Bioartificial liver devices are being built that allow for effective preservation of hepatocytes, and one such device has recently demonstrated survival benefit in a porcine model of liver failure.SummaryCell transplantation of primary hepatocytes or stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells for the treatment of chronic liver disease holds promise. Bioartificial liver systems may in the future be able to bridge acute-on-chronic liver failure patients to liver transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available