4.6 Article

Performances of the New HEC-RAS Version 5 for 2-D Hydrodynamic-Based Rainfall-Runoff Simulations at Basin Scale: Comparison with a State-of-the Art Model

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12092326

Keywords

two-dimensional models; HEC-RAS; runoff simulations; flood hazard mapping

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [2017-067]
  2. LaMPIT Laboratory [PON SILA-PONa3_00341A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hydrologic Engineering Centre-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS), developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers, is one of the most known, analyzed and used model for flood mapping both in the scientific literature and in practice. In the recently released version (release 5.0.7), the HEC-RAS model has been enriched with novel modules, performing fully 2-D computations based on the 2-D fully dynamic equations as well as the 2-D diffusion wave equations; moreover the application of rainfall to each cell of the two-dimensional domain is now possible. Contrarily to the common applications for flood propagation in river reach, this specific module has never been analyzed in the literature. Therefore, the main purpose of this work is to assess the potential and the capabilities of the 2-D HEC-RAS model in rainfall-runoff simulations at the basin scale, comparing the results obtained using both the options (fully dynamic equations and diffusion wave equations) to the simulations obtained by using a 2-D fully dynamic model developed by the authors for research purposes. Both models have been tested in a small basin in Northern Italy to analyze the differences in terms of discharge hydrographs and flooded areas. The application of a criterion for hazard class mapping has shown significant variations between the two models. These results provide practical indications for the water engineering community in the innovative research field related to the use of 2-D SWEs at the basin scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available