4.6 Review

Forces, stresses and the (thermo?) dynamics of active matter

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 24-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2015.12.003

Keywords

Active matter; Swim pressure; Nonequilibrium systems; Collective behavior

Funding

  1. Gates Millennium Scholars
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DGE-1144469]
  3. NSF [CBET 1437570]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1437570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The statistical mechanics and microhydrodynamics of active matter systems have been studied intensively during the past several years, by various soft matter physicists, chemists, engineers, and biologists around the world. Recent attention has focused on the fascinating nonequilibrium behaviors of active matter that cannot be observed in equilibrium thermodynamic systems, such as spontaneous collective motion and swarming. Even minimal kinetic models of active Brownian particles exhibit self-assembly that resembles a gas-liquid phase separation from classical equilibrium systems. Self-propulsion. allows active systems to generate internal stresses that enable them to control and direct their own behavior and that of their surroundings. In this review, we discuss the forces that govern the motion of active Brownian microswimmers, the stress (or pressure) they generate, and the implication of these concepts on their collective behavior. We focus on recent work involving the unique swim pressure exerted by active systems and discuss how this perspective may be the basic underlying physical mechanism responsible for self-assembly and pattern formation in all active matter. We discuss the utility of the swim pressure concept to quantify the forces, stresses, and the (thermo?) dynamics of active matter. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available