4.3 Article

Design and Evaluation of an Augmented Reality-Based Exergame System to Reduce Fall Risk in the Elderly

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197208

Keywords

fall risk; augmented reality; exergame; cognitive– motor intervention; UEQ-S; user experience

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Federation of Humanities and Social Science Circles [2018Z09]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LGF19H260006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Falls are a major public health concern in today's aging society. Virtual reality (VR) technology is a promising method for reducing fall risk. However, the absence of representations of the user's body in a VR environment lessens the spatial sense of presence. In terms of user experience, augmented reality (AR) can provide a higher degree of presence and embodiment than VR. We developed an AR-based exergame system that is specifically designed for the elderly to reduce fall risk. Kinect2.0 was used to capture and generate 3D models of the elderly and immerse them in an interactive virtual environment. The software included three functional modules: fall risk assessment, cognitive-motor intervention (CMI) training, and training feedback. The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S) was used to evaluate user experience. Twenty-five elders were enrolled in the study. It was shown that the average scores for each aspect were: pragmatic quality score (1.652 +/- 0.868); hedonic quality score (1.880 +/- 0.962); and overall score was 1.776 +/- 0.819. The overall score was higher than 0.8, which means that the system exhibited a positive user experience. After comparing the average score in a dataset product of UEQ-S Data Analysis Tool, it was found that the pragmatic quality aspect was categorized as good, while the hedonic quality aspect was categorized as excellent. It revealed a positive evaluation from users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available