4.7 Article

Nonstationary Discrete Convolution Kernel for Multimodal Process Monitoring

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2945847

Keywords

Kernel; Principal component analysis; Training; Convolution; Data models; Fault detection; kernel-based learning methods; multivariate statistics; nonstationary kernels; process monitoring

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [675215-PRONTO-H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data-driven process monitoring has benefited from the development and application of kernel transformations, especially when various types of nonlinearity exist in the data. However, when dealing with the multimodality behavior that is frequently observed in the process operations, the most widely used radial basis function (RBF) kernel has limitations in describing process data collected from multiple normal operating modes. In this article, we highlight this limitation via a synthesized example. In order to account for the multimodality behavior and improve the fault detection performance accordingly, we propose a novel nonstationary discrete convolution kernel, which derives from the convolution kernel structure, as an alternative to the RBF kernel. By assuming the training samples to be the support of the discrete convolution, this new kernel can properly address these training samples from different operating modes with diverse properties and, therefore, can improve the data description and fault detection performance. Its performance is compared with RBF kernels under a standard kernel principal component analysis framework and with other methods proposed for multimode process monitoring via numerical examples. Moreover, a benchmark data set collected from a pilot-scale multiphase flow facility is used to demonstrate the advantages of the new kernel when applied to an experimental data set.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available