4.8 Article

Temporal Proteomic Analysis of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infection Reveals Cell-Surface Remodeling via pUL56-Mediated GOPC Degradation

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108235

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust PhD studentships
  2. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Wellcome Trust [098406/Z/12/B]
  3. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship - Royal Society [098406/Z/12/B]
  4. Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Research Fellowship [108070/Z/15/Z]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Research Grant [BB/M021424/1]
  6. Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub
  7. BBSRC [BB/M021424/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Wellcome Trust [098406/Z/12/B] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herpesviruses are ubiquitous in the human population and they extensively remodel the cellular environment during infection. Multiplexed quantitative proteomic analysis over the time course of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection was used to characterize changes in the host-cell proteome and the kinetics of viral protein production. Several host-cell proteins are targeted for rapid degradation by HSV-1, including the cellular trafficking factor Golgi-associated PDZ and coiled-coil motif-containing protein (GOPC). We show that the poorly characterized HSV-1 pUL56 directly binds GOPC, stimulating its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Plasma membrane profiling reveals that pUL56 mediates specific changes to the cell-surface proteome of infected cells, including loss of interleukin-18 (IL18) receptor and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), and that cell-surface expression of TLR2 is GOPC dependent. Our study provides significant resources for future investigation of HSV-host interactions and highlights an efficient mechanism whereby a single virus protein targets a cellular trafficking factor to modify the surface of infected cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available