4.8 Article

PICALM Rescues Endocytic Defects Caused by the Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factor APOE4

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108224

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
  2. Picower Institute for Learning and Memory
  3. Robert A. and Renee E. Belfer Family Foundation
  4. JPB Foundation
  5. Edward N. and Della L. Thome Foundation
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. American Parkinson's Disease Foundation
  8. NIH [R21 NS087557, NIA RF1AG062377, R01AG058002, U54-HG008097]
  9. Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  10. EMBO fellowship [ALTF 829-2015]
  11. NIH K99 award [NIA AG055697-03]
  12. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIDDK)
  13. Neurodegeneration Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epsilon 4 allele of apolipoprotein E (APOE4) is a genetic risk factor for many diseases, including late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigate the cellular consequences of APOE4 in human iPSC-derived astrocytes, observing an endocytic defect in APOE4 astrocytes compared with their isogenic APOE3 counter-parts. Given the evolutionarily conserved nature of endocytosis, we built a yeast model to identify genetic modifiers of the endocytic defect associated with APOE4. In yeast, only the expression of APOE4 results in dose-dependent defects in both endocytosis and growth. We discover that increasing expression of the early endocytic adaptor protein Yap1802p, a homolog of the human AD risk factor PICALM, rescues the APOE4-induced endocytic defect. In iPSC-derived human astrocytes, increasing expression of PICALM similarly reverses endocytic disruptions. Our work identifies a functional interaction between two AD genetic risk factors-APOE4 and PICALM-centered on the conserved biological process of endocytosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available