4.8 Article

Evasion of Type I Interferon by SARS-CoV-2

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108234

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [AI142759, AI134907, AI145617, UL1TR001439, R01AI134907, R21AI132479-01, R21AI126012-01A1, U19AI100625, R00AG049092, R24AI120942]
  2. Sealy & Smith Foundation
  3. Kleberg Foundation
  4. John S. Dunn Foundation
  5. Amon G. Carter Foundation
  6. Gillson Longenbaugh Foundation
  7. Summerfield Robert Foundation
  8. STARs Award from the University of Texas System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication and host immune response determine coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but studies evaluating viral evasion of immune response are lacking. Here, we use unbiased screening to identify SARS-CoV-2 proteins that antagonize type I interferon (IFN-I) response. We found three proteins that antagonize IFN-I production via distinct mechanisms: nonstructural protein 6 (nsp6) binds TANK binding kinase 1 (TBK1) to suppress interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) phosphorylation, nsp13 binds and blocks TBK1 phosphorylation, and open reading frame 6 (ORF6) binds importin Karyopherin a 2 (KPNA2) to inhibit IRF3 nuclear translocation. We identify two sets of viral proteins that antagonize IFN-I signaling through blocking signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1)/STAT2 phosphorylation or nuclear translocation. Remarkably, SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 and nsp6 suppress IFN-I signaling more efficiently than SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Thus, when treated with IFN-I, a SARS-CoV-2 replicon replicates to a higher level than chimeric replicons containing nsp1 or nsp6 from SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV. Altogether, the study provides insights on SARS-CoV-2 evasion of IFN-I response and its potential impact on viral transmission and pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available