4.8 Review

Brain States and Transitions: Insights from Computational Neuroscience

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108128

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ERC [615539]
  2. Center for Music in the Brain - Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF117]
  3. Centre for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing - Pettit Foundation
  4. Carlsberg Foundation
  5. Spanish Research Project (AEI FEDER EU) - Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU), State Research Agency (AEI) [PID2019-105772GB-I00]
  6. European Regional Development Funds (FEDER)
  7. HBP SGA3 Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement - EU H2020 FET Flagship program [3, 945539]
  8. SGR Research Support Group - Catalan Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) [2017 SGR 1545]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the field of computational neuroscience there are great expectations of finding new ways to rebalance the complex dynamic system of the human brain through controlled pharmacological or electromagnetic perturbation. Yet many obstacles remain between the ability to accurately predict how and where best to perturb to force a transition from one brain state to another. The foremost challenge is a commonly agreed definition of a given brain state. Recent progress in computational neuroscience has made it possible to robustly define brain states and force transitions between them. Here, we review the state of the art and propose a framework for determining the functional hierarchical organization describing any given brain state. We describe the latest advances in creating sophisticated whole-brain computational models with interacting neuronal and neurotransmitter systems that can be studied fully in silico to predict and design novel pharmacological and electromagnetic interventions to rebalance them in disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available