4.5 Article

When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist

Journal

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 370, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2864

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health [PJT-148870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication is an essential part of the scientific method, yet replication of systematic reviews is too often overlooked, and done unnecessarily or poorly. Excessive replication (doing the same study repeatedly) is unethical and a cause of research wastage. This article provides consensus based guidance on when to replicate and not replicate systematic reviews.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available