4.7 Article

Securing the Exchange of Synthetic Genetic Constructs Using Digital Signatures

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 2656-2664

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00401

Keywords

DNA; security; cryptography; synthetic biology

Funding

  1. NSF [1934573, 1832320]
  2. Colorado State University's Office of the Vice President for Research Catalyst for Innovative Partnerships Program
  3. foundation's Independent Research and Development program for staff
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1934573] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1832320] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of synthetic biology relies on an ever-growing supply chain of synthetic genetic material. Technologies to secure the exchange of this material are still in their infancy. Solutions proposed thus far have focused on watermarks, a dated security approach that can be used to claim authorship, but is subject to counterfeit, and does not provide any information about the integrity of the genetic material itself. In this manuscript, we describe how data encryption and digital signature algorithms can be used to ensure the integrity and authenticity of synthetic genetic constructs. Using a pilot software that generates digital signatures and other encrypted data for plasmids, we demonstrate that we can predictably extract information about the author, the identity, the integrity of plasmid sequences, and even annotations from sequencing data alone without a reference sequence, all without compromising the function of the plasmids. Encoding a digital signature into a DNA molecule provides an avenue for genetic designers to claim authorship of DNA molecules. This technology could help compliance with material transfer agreements and other licensing agreements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available