4.7 Article

Elevated perfusate [Na+] increases contractile dysfunction during ischemia and reperfusion

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74069-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL141855, R01-HL138003, R01-HL102298, F31-HL147438, R01-HL132236, R01-HL123647]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies revealed that relatively small changes in perfusate sodium ([Na+](o)) composition significantly affect cardiac electrical conduction and stability in contraction arrested ex vivo Langendorff heart preparations before and during simulated ischemia. Additionally, [Na+](o) modulates cardiomyocyte contractility via a sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) mediated pathway. It remains unknown, however, whether modest changes to [Na+](o) that promote electrophysiologic stability similarly improve mechanical function during baseline and ischemia-reperfusion conditions. The purpose of this study was to quantify cardiac mechanical function during ischemia-reperfusion with perfusates containing 145 or 155 mM Na+ in Langendorff perfused isolated rat heart preparations. Relative to 145 mM Na+, perfusion with 155 mM [Na+](o) decreased the amplitude of left-ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) at baseline and accelerated the onset of ischemic contracture. Inhibiting NCX with SEA0400 abolished LVDP depression caused by increasing [Na+](o) at baseline and reduced the time to peak ischemic contracture. Ischemia-reperfusion decreased LVDP in all hearts with return of intrinsic activity, and reperfusion with 155 mM [Na+](o) further depressed mechanical function. In summary, elevating [Na+](o) by as little as 10 mM can significantly modulate mechanical function under baseline conditions, as well as during ischemia and reperfusion. Importantly, clinical use of Normal Saline, which contains 155 mM [Na+](o), with cardiac ischemia may require further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available