4.7 Article

Prevalence and Predictors of Emotional Eating among Healthy Young Saudi Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12102923

Keywords

Emotional Eating Scale; Increased intake; COVID-19; quarantine; stress; BMI; food consumption; young women

Funding

  1. Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia [IFKSURG-1441-346]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emotional eating (EE) is prevalent among women and is associated with obesity. The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and mandatory quarantine increased the risk of mental symptoms and, inferentially, emotional eating (EE). We investigated the EE prevalence and predictors during this pandemic. Overall, 638 women, ages 18-39, completed an online survey incorporating the Emotional Eating Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. We asked about nutrition and collected data on weight, height, and pandemic responses. Most respondents (47.2%) reported low EE; 40.4% were moderate and 12.4% high emotional eaters; 42.8% reported depression, 27% anxiety, 71% moderate stress, and 12.5% severe stress. The main EE indicators/predictors were fat intake (beta = 0.192, p = 0.004), number of meals (beta = 0.187, p < 0.001), sugar consumption (beta = 0.150, p < 0.001), body mass index (beta = 0.149, p < 0.001), stress (beta = 0.143, p = 0.004), energy intake (beta = 0.134, p = 0.04), and fast food intake frequency (beta = 0.111, p < 0.01). EE score correlated negatively with increased family income (beta = -0.081, p = 0.049). Higher stress correlated with worse sleep, less sleep, and less physical activity. Emotional eating is common among young Saudi women during the pandemic. We recommend healthy food choices and increased physical activity to improve sleep and mitigate stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available