4.6 Review

Development of Anticancer Agents from Plant-Derived Sesquiterpene Lactones

Journal

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 2397-2420

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666160510123255

Keywords

Artemisinin; Dimers of artemisinin; Dimethylaminoparthenolide; Parthenolide; Potential anticancer agents; Sesquiterpene lactones; Thapsigargin

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA [P01 CA125066]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA185301, P01CA125066] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sesquiterpene lactones are of considerable interest due to their potent bioactivities, including cancer cell cytotoxicity and antineoplastic efficacy in in vivo studies. Among these compounds, artesunate, dimethylaminoparthenolide, and L12ADT peptide prodrug, a derivative of thapsigargin, are being evaluated in the current cancer clinical or preclinical trials. Based on the structures of several antitumor sesquiterpene lactones, a number of analogues showing greater potency have been either isolated as natural products or partially synthesized, and some potential anticancer agents that have emerged from this group of lead compounds have been investigated extensively. The present review focuses on artemisinin, parthenolide, thapsigargin, and their naturally occurring or synthetic analogues showing potential anticancer activity. This provides an overview of the advances in the development of these types of sesquiterpene lactones as potential anticancer agents, including their structural characterization, synthesis and synthetic modification, and antitumor potential, with the mechanism of action and structure-activity relationships also discussed. It is hoped that this will be helpful in stimulating the further interest in developing sesquiterpene lactones and their derivatives as new anticancer agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available