4.8 Article

Divergent forest sensitivity to repeated extreme droughts

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages 1091-U19

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-00919-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. David and Lucille Packard Foundation
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural and Food Research Initiative Competitive Programme, Ecosystem Services and Agro-ecosystem Management [2018-67019-27850]
  3. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural and Food Research Initiative Competitive Programme [2018-67012-31496]
  4. University of California Laboratory Fees Research Program [LFR-20-652467]
  5. NASA Carbon Cycle Science Program
  6. NOAA [NA17OAR4310127]
  7. NSF [1714972, 1802880]
  8. NASA [80NSSC18K0715]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change-driven increases in drought frequency and severity could compromise forest ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink(1-3). While the impacts of single droughts on forests have been widely studied(4-6), understanding whether forests acclimate to or become more vulnerable to sequential droughts remains largely unknown and is crucial for predicting future forest health. We combine cross-biome datasets of tree growth, tree mortality and ecosystem water content to quantify the effects of multiple droughts at a range of scales from individual trees to the globe from 1900 to 2018. We find that subsequent droughts generally have a more deleterious impact than initial droughts, but this effect differs enormously by clade and ecosystem, with gymnosperms and conifer-dominated ecosystems more often exhibiting increased vulnerability to multiple droughts. The differential impacts of multiple droughts across clades and biomes indicate that drought frequency changes may have fundamentally different ecological and carbon-cycle consequences across ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available