4.5 Article

It's not just hacking for the sake of it: a qualitative study of health innovators' views on patient-driven open innovations, quality and safety

Journal

BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 731-738

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011254

Keywords

patient-centred care; patient safety; risk management; standards of care; healthcare quality improvement

Funding

  1. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec -Sante
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-143294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Health innovators generally support patient-driven initiatives but also call for the involvement of professionals with complementary skills and knowledge. They see Nightscout as a high-risk DIY solution that requires expert involvement and e-NABLE as a low-risk solution that fills a hard-to-meet gap.
Background Open do-it-yourself (DIY) health innovations raise new dilemmas for patient-oriented and service-oriented scholars and healthcare providers. Our study aimed to generate practical insights into quality and safety issues to patient care raised by two volunteer-run, open DIY solutions: Nightscout Project (patient-driven, open-source software for type 1 diabetes management) and e-NABLE (volunteers who design and three-dimensionally print upper-limb assistive devices). To this end, we examined the views of health innovators who are knowledgeable about medical devices standards and regulations. Methods We applied a multimedia-based, data-elicitation technique to conduct indepth interviews with a diversified sample of 31 health innovators practising in two Canadian provinces (Quebec and Ontario). An exploratory thematic analysis approach was used to identify respondents' reasoning processes and compare their overall judgements of Nightscout and e-NABLE. Results Respondents pondered the following quality and safety issues: importance of the need addressed; accessibility; volunteers' ability to develop and maintain a safe solution of good quality; risks involved for users; consequences of not using the solution; and liability. Overall, innovators see Nightscout as a high-risk DIY solution that requires expert involvement and e-NABLE as a low-risk one that fills a hard-to-meet gap. Conclusion Health innovators generally support patient-driven initiatives but also call for the involvement of professionals who possess complementary skills and knowledge. Our findings provide a list of issues healthcare providers may discuss with patients during clinical consultations to document potential risks and benefits of open DIY solutions. To inform new policy approaches, we propose the development of publicly funded umbrella organisations to act as intermediaries between open DIY solutions and regulatory bodies to help them meet quality and safety standards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available