4.3 Review

Relationship Between Antihypertensive Medications and Cognitive Impairment: Part I. Review of Human Studies and Clinical Trials

Journal

CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11906-016-0674-1

Keywords

Antihypertensive medication; Cognitive decline; Dementia; Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health Research
  2. Imperial College, London
  3. National Institute for Health Research [PDF-2012-05-197] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PDF-2012-05-197] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review There is an established association between hypertension and increased risk of poor cognitive performance and dementia including Alzheimer's disease; however, associations between antihypertensive medications (AHMs) and dementia risk are less consistent. An increased interest in AHM has resulted in expanding publications; however, none of the recent reviews are comprehensive. Our extensive review includes 15 observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published over the last 5 years, assessing the relationship between AHM and cognitive impairment. Recent findings All classes of AHM showed similar result patterns in human studies with the majority of study results reporting point estimates below one and only a small number of studies (N = 15) reporting statistically significant results in favor of a specific class. Summary Only a small number of studies reported statistically significant results in favor of a specific class of AHM. Methodological limitations of the studies prevent definitive conclusions. Further work is now needed to evaluate the class of AHM and cognitive outcomes in future RCTs, with a particular focus on the drugs with the promising results in both animals and human observational studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available