4.4 Article

Phylogenomic analysis clarifies the evolutionary origin of Coffea arabica

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 953-963

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jse.12694

Keywords

allopolyploidy; Coffea arabica (Arabica coffee); genotyping‐ by‐ sequencing; hybridization; molecular dating; self‐ compatibility

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) [G056517N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evolutionary origin of the allotetraploid species Coffea arabica, cultivated for Arabica coffee production, was inferred through genetic distances and a time-calibrated phylogenetic tree, confirming Coffea canephora and C. eugenioides as the putative progenitor species. The hybridization event between these species likely occurred between 1.08 million and 543,000 years ago, coinciding with environmental upheaval that could have facilitated the emergence of C. arabica.
Interspecific hybridization events have played a major role in plant speciation, yet the evolutionary origin of hybrid species often remains enigmatic. Here, we inferred the evolutionary origin of the allotetraploid species Coffea arabica, which is widely cultivated for Arabica coffee production. We estimated genetic distances between C. arabica and all species that are known to be closely related to C. arabica using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data. In addition, we reconstructed a time-calibrated multilabeled phylogenetic tree of 24 species to estimate the age of the C. arabica hybridization event. Ancestral states of self-compatibility were also inferred to shed new light on the evolution of self-compatibility in Coffea. Coffea canephora and C. eugenioides were confirmed as the putative progenitor species of C. arabica. These species most likely hybridized between 1.08 million and 543 000 years ago, coinciding with periods of environmental upheaval, which may have induced range shifts of the progenitor species that facilitated the emergence of C. arabica.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available