4.6 Review

The molecular mechanisms of MLKL-dependent and MLKL-independent necrosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 3-14

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa055

Keywords

MLKL; necrosis; necroptosis; mechanism; diseases

Categories

Funding

  1. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for 'Significant New Drugs Development' [2018ZX09733001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0201402]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation Regional Innovation and Development [U19A2003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Necrosis, as a type of passive cell demise, is considered unregulated but can be regulated under certain special conditions such as caspase inhibition. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms of MLKL-dependent and MLKL-independent necrosis, shedding light on the programmed cell death processes.
Necrosis, a type of unwanted and passive cell demise, usually occurs under the excessive external stress and is considered to be unregulated. However, under some special conditions such as caspase inhibition, necrosis is regulable in a well-orchestrated way. The term 'regulated necrosis' has been proposed to describe such programed necrosis. Recently, several forms of necrosis, including necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, parthanatos, oxytosis, NETosis, and Na+/K+-ATPase-mediated necrosis, have been identified, and some crucial regulators governing regulated necrosis have also been discovered. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL), a core regulator in necroptosis, acts as an executioner in response to ligands of death receptor family. Its activation requires the receptor-interacting protein kinases, RIP1 and RIP3. However, MLKL is only involved in necroptosis, i.e. MLKL is dispensable for necrosis. Therefore, this review is aimed at summarizing the molecular mechanisms of MLKL-dependent and MLKL-independent necrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available