4.4 Review

Targeting MET Receptor in Rhabdomyosarcoma: Rationale and Progress

Journal

CURRENT DRUG TARGETS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 98-107

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389450117666151209124123

Keywords

MET receptor; MET/HGF axis; cancer; rhabdomyosarcoma; metastasis; myogenesis

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N N 401 615840]
  2. National Science Center in Poland [2013/09/B/NZ5/00769]
  3. Leading National Research Center (KNOW) programme from by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  4. Foundation for Polish Science's START scholarship for outstanding young scientists
  5. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education's scholarship for outstanding young scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MET is a tyrosine kinase receptor, which binds hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). It regulates many physiological processes and participates in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation and motility of various cells. It plays an important role in embryogenesis as well as in adult life. Aberrations within the regulatory pathways activated by MET can be one of the causes of tumor development. Recently novel important functions of MET signaling in tumor development have been described, such as maintenance of cancer stem cells or importance of endosomal localization of MET. Moreover, MET is considered as one of the important factors responsible for development of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), a soft tissue sarcoma related to myogenic lineage. Its origin remains debatable but it is suggested that it derives from defect in differentiation of the satellite cells or of the mesenchymal stem cells. In RMS MET downregulation induces differentiation of tumor cells and in consequence, metastatic potential of RMS cells is diminished. Therefore, blocking of MET may be clinically useful in novel differentiationbased therapies of RMS in future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available