Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols in NSQIP and Association With Colectomy Outcomes
Julia R. Berian et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2019)
Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study
Javier Ripolles-Melchor et al.
JAMA SURGERY (2019)
Compliance with the ERAS Protocol and 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopic Surgery for Non-metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Magdalena Pisarska et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2019)
Uptake of enhanced recovery practices by SAGES members: a survey
Deborah S. Keller et al.
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2017)
A Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis Decisions and Overview of Current Practices: What We Are Doing and How Can We Improve?
Matt C. Howard
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (2016)
Cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of team training on surgical outcomes
A. Duclos et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2016)
Adherence to the ERAS protocol is Associated with 5-Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Ulf O. Gustafsson et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2016)
Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009-2012
J. C. Simpson et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2015)
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a meta-analysis
Tian-Gen Ni et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2015)
The effect of teamwork training on team performance and clinical outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery: a controlled interrupted time series study
Lauren Morgan et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Graham F. Moore et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Graham F. Moore et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis
S. R. Markar et al.
DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS (2015)
Questionnaire surveys: sources of bias
Philip Sedgwick
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)
Failure to Rescue Patients After Reintervention in Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery in England
Alex M. Almoudaris et al.
JAMA SURGERY (2013)
Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches
Martha Sinclair et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2012)
An Analysis of Response Rate and Economic Costs Between Mail and Web-Based Surveys Among Practicing Dentists: A Randomized Trial
Patrick C. Hardigan et al.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH (2012)
Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Ulf O. Gustafsson et al.
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2011)
Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue With High-risk Surgery
Amir A. Ghaferi et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2011)
Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery
Michel Adamina et al.
SURGERY (2011)
Association Between Implementation of a Medical Team Training Program and Surgical Mortality
Julia Neily et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
Intelligent information: A national system for monitoring clinical performance
Alex Bottle et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2008)
Evaluating patients' experiences with individual physicians - A randomized trial of mail Internet and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys
HP Rodriguez et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2006)
Treating Individuals 1 - External validity of randomised controlled trials: To whom do the results of this trial apply?'
PM Rothwell
LANCET (2005)