4.8 Article

Energy-efficient erythromycin degradation using UV-LED (275 nm)/chlorine process: Radical contribution, transformation products, and toxicity evaluation

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116159

Keywords

Byproduct; Radical scavenger; Radical; Toxicity; Ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV-LED); UV/Chlorine

Funding

  1. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) [2019002710001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the degradation mechanism of erythromycin (ERY) during UV-LED/chlorine treatment using a 275-nm ultraviolet light-emitting diode (UV-LED). This wavelength is known to generate fewer disinfection byproducts (DBPs), and to have higher energy and photon yield efficiency compared to low pressure mercury (LP-UV) lamp which emits 254 nm of UV radiation. The degradation of ERY during the UV-LED/chlorine reaction followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. While Cl center dot and ClO center dot radicals along with other secondary radicals played key roles in the degradation of ERY at alkaline pH conditions, center dot OH radical was the main contributor at acidic pH conditions. Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QToF-MS), we tentatively identified six byproducts. Trace amounts of DBPs, such as chloroform (CHCl3) and chlorate (ClO(3) over bar) ions, were also detected at less than 0.3 mg/L. There was no residual antibiotic effect at the end of the UV-LED/ chlorine reaction due to the complete degradation of important moieties, such as macrolide, in ERY. Toxicity decreased by 20% after 20 min during the UV-LED/chlorine process of ERY (1.0 mg/L) degradation. Finally, we confirmed the inactivation of ARB and ARG during the UV-LED/chlorine process. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available