4.8 Review

The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116058

Keywords

WWTP; Environmental Impacts; Recommendations; LCA-Water Working Group; Guidelines; Sewage

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and competitiveness [RYC-2013-465 14595]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya through Consolidated Research Group [2017 SGR 1318]
  3. CERCA program [ED431C2017/029, ED431E 2018/01]
  4. FEDER (EU) [ED431C2017/029, ED431E 2018/01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been widely applied in the wastewater industry, but inconsistencies in assumptions and methods have made it difficult for researchers and practitioners to synthesize results from across studies. This paper presents a critical review of published LCAs related to municipal wastewater management with a focus on developing systematic guidance for researchers and practitioners to conduct LCA studies to inform planning, design, and optimization of wastewater management and infrastructure (wastewater treatment plants, WWTPs; collection and reuse systems; related treatment technologies and policies), and to support the development of new technologies to advance treatment objectives and the sustainability of wastewater management. The paper guides the reader step by step through LCA methodology to make informed decisions on i) the definition of the goal and scope, ii) the selection of the functional unit and system boundaries, iii) the selection of variables to include and their sources to obtain inventories, iv) the selection of impact assessment methods, and v) the selection of an effective approach for data interpretation and communication to decision-makers. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available