4.4 Article

A comparative study on biological characteristics of ten coxsackievirus A10 virus strains

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 555, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.07.003

Keywords

Coxsackievirus A10; Hand foot and mouth disease; Biological characteristics; Vaccine candidate strains

Categories

Funding

  1. Yunnan Important New Product Development Plan [2015 BC008]
  2. Medical and Health Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed ten CVA10 strains, all falling into Genotype C, through genotyping and culture experiments. The results showed that the infectious titer of these strains increased with each generation in cell culture, causing limb paralysis in mice. The strains induced a good immune response and could potentially serve as candidates for CVA10 vaccines.
In this study, we analyzed ten CVA10 strains were genotyped and cultured for 10 generations to detect plaque morphology, pathogenicity, growth and other characteristics. Mice were injected with live and inactivated virus to detect neutralizing antibody titers. The results suggested that all CVA10 strains fell into Genotype C. Each strain cultured on KMB17 and Vero cells, increased from 1st generation onwards to peak in the 3rd and 4th, and the titer at which each became infectious ranged from 5.0 to 6.5 and 6.0 to 7.0 lgCCID(50)/ml, respectively. Twoday-old BALB/c mice were selected and inoculated intracerebral with the CVA10 strains, Limb paralysis was significant as early as 3 d; paralysis of all limbs for 50% of affected mice. LT50 was approximately 6 d, all died within 8 d. Ten strains induced good immune response, the GMT value of booster immunizations was higher than that of initial immunization. This provide reference points for selecting CVA10 vaccine candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available