4.2 Article

Application of an extracorporeal prefenestrated stent graft in endovascular repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch lesions

Journal

VASCULAR
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 323-329

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1708538120950876

Keywords

Aortic dissection; penetrating ulcer; prefenestration; thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Funding

  1. Project of Science and Technology Development of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [2018BEG03029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular repair of aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch using an external prefenestrated stent. The results showed that this treatment option was feasible and had positive outcomes in most cases.
Objectives Aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch is a serious condition. Treatment using traditional surgical methods has certain disadvantages. This study investigated the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular repair of aortic dissection using an external prefenestrated stent. Methods We present a series of aortic dissection cases involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch treated with an external prefenestrated stent. Results Postoperative follow-up of the patients showed that all stents were released at the proper position and that branch vessels were not occluded, and there were no instances of type I endoleak. One patient died suddenly one week after surgery; another experienced retrograde type A aortic dissection in the second week; and type I endoleak occurred in one patient in the first week, although this resolved within six months. No serious complications such as cerebrovascular events, acute spinal cord ischemia, and paraplegia occurred during the perioperative period. All patients had false lumen thrombosis in the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Conclusion Prefenestrated stent grafting is a feasible treatment option for repairing an entry tear in the ascending aorta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available